On Thu, 2009-05-28 at 12:58 -0500, Danny Nicholas wrote: > This being said, I’d probably go with 1.4.21.X since anything above > that replaces zaptel with DAHDI. There are still a lot of things “To > be worked out” in DAHDI – Zaptel is a pretty solid standard.
It continues to amaze me when I hear this, as there really isn't much difference between Zaptel and DAHDI. In fact, the only two differences I know about are: 1) The name change 2) Making software echo can modules able to be loaded on a per-channel basis 3) DAHDI will continue to be developed, Zaptel will not I've been using DAHDI in both my personal systems and in the Asterisk training classes I teach for more than six months now, and I have yet to find any reason not to use it. If you're having problems with DAHDI, mind sharing the specifics of what those are? I've also been using the 1.6.0 branch of Asterisk, and it's been *much* more solid than the 1.4 branch for me and the things I use. It's not to say there haven't been some quirky little bugs, but overall I've been very happy with it. As far as Linux distributions go, I'd say go with whatever you're most comfortable with, and will have the best chance of supporting over the long term. I personally like RHEL and CentOS, but Debian or Ubuntu LTS would be great choices as well, as they all have *years* worth of updates rather than months. (Please read these comments as own opinion, and not necessarily being officially endorsed by my employer.) -- Jared Smith Training Manager Digium, Inc. _______________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
