On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 01:32:58PM -0500, Danny Nicholas wrote:
> There are over 100 open items on the Digium board related to DAHDI.
Which is because people use it. I wonder which of those are actually
regressions from before the DAHDI times (not that others are less
serious. But this is what i relevant to your argument)
> I'm
> sure quite a few are "chair-to-keyboard" issues, but here are two real ones:
> 1. DAHDI will not look for a connection when dialing, so if I make a call
> and play a file, X percent of the file plays before the person actually (if
> ever) answers the phone.
Bug number?
I can think of a number of reasons why such a thing should happen (for
good reasons).
> 2. DAHDI (IMO and IME) is more difficult to tune than Zaptel.
Please be more specific. Any examples?
The only usability regression I can think of is that you have to
explicitly add 'echocancel' lines to /etc/dahdi/system.conf for every
channel, whereas in Zaptel there was one hardwired EC. I tried to give a
reasonable workaround for those who use dahdi_genconf .
>
> I'm certain that DAHDI will be solid and great in a few years; It just
> doesn't seem to be yet.
>
> Zaptel isn't the "end all" either; I upgraded to 1.4.25-rc1 because I
> couldn't get zaptel to tune sufficiently on 1.4.21.2. We use POTS for our
> outgoing service and haven't gotten satisfactory results with DAHDI or
> Zaptel on TDM400 and TDM410.
Asterisk 1.4.x should work well with Zaptel. If it doesn't, it's a bug.
At the moment I can't think of any such issues in 1.4.25-rc1 or later.
Could you please be more specific?
--
Tzafrir Cohen
icq#16849755 jabber:[email protected]
+972-50-7952406 mailto:[email protected]
http://www.xorcom.com iax:[email protected]/tzafrir
_______________________________________________
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
