On Monday 19 January 2004 08:34, Eric Wieling wrote: > On Sun, 2004-01-18 at 22:22, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > It will probably be impossible to divide audio clips into > > different directories without duplication of clips or massive > > headaches determining direcories. My suggested method of handling > > this is to have all of the sounds in one directory and create
This is actually a bad idea. While many filesystems today have binary tree directory structures, some still do not. Allowing too many miscellaneous sounds in a single directory is not only difficult to browse, it may also consume inordinate amounts of CPU, memory, and user time attempting to process the directory structure. > > multiple indexes. Each index would have listed all words/phrases > > for the topic. For example all weather terms would be placed in a > > "weather" index. Any phases needed for weather would be in here > > even if it appears in other indexes such as a "time" index or a > > "monitoring" index. The index would point to the actual audio > > clip of this common directory. > > What about using hard links or symlinks? Hard links and symlinks do not translate well to CVS. -Tilghman _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
