> This is actually a bad idea. While many filesystems today have binary > tree directory structures, some still do not. Allowing too many > miscellaneous sounds in a single directory is not only difficult to > browse, it may also consume inordinate amounts of CPU, memory, and > user time attempting to process the directory structure.
I agree, but I would have figured that any modern OS would have cached, hashed and otherwise unfolded the directory structure into something ridiculously easy to access after the first read and parse. Regards, Andrew _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
