On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 4:23 PM, Alex Balashov <[email protected]> wrote: > > It's also problematic because a 3261-compliant SIP proxy or UAC is not > going to attempt to reach the destination by alternate means (serial > forking in the case of the proxy, or a new call leg in the case of the > UA) because of this precise implication of 6xx-class final replies. > > -- Alex
This is precisely why some proxies (including OpenSIPS & Kamailio) have added the disable_6xx_block parameter to specifically "break" this "3261-compliant" behavior. Of course this being a global proxy parameter prevents cases where you really do want a 603 to stop forking. I've read that OpenSIPS is going to make it possible to activate this behavior via flags or some other means but in the meantime I'd like to see Asterisk be a little more flexible and um, friendly in this case. Luckily Asterisk is open source and I can make that change if I like but... A quick poll: Who thinks Asterisk should severely limit the cases it sends 6xx responses? -- Kristian Kielhofner http://www.astlinux.org http://blog.krisk.org http://www.star2star.com http://www.submityoursip.com http://www.voalte.com -- _____________________________________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
