On 15/6/10 06:22, Randy R wrote: > By the way, I am currently testing this product from Skype. I would > like to be able to receive calls ona Skype name on our pbx. > > 1) It works beautifully and you don't have to do anything in particular. > > 2) It's disproportionally expensive which is why I want Skype for > Asterisk to work. > > SfS costs $5 per month per channel just to test the beta! I find that > insane, but I wanted to test it. > In October, they will begin charging for Skype Manager (required for > SfS) and a per seat charge for that. > SfA also requires Skype Manager, and only works with users that were created with it. (At Skypes insistance afaict).
The only architectures supported by SfA at the moment are x86 and x86-64. Also afaik, video still doesn't work with it. -- _____________________________________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
