Dear;
I know understand the latency due to the resending .. But if the link was have
a good speed internet, then resending will make a big latency?
Maybe this latency better than having a cutting voice?
What if we reduce the packet size and make it TCP, so resending might cause
acceptable delay?
But again, what about running IAX in TCP port, this is possible?
Any other solution to resolve the cutting in the voice while others doing
download and browsing?
Regards
Bilal
>
> On 30 Nov 2010, at 09:28, bilal ghayyad wrote:
> > If I ran IAX in TCP port, and in case my network was
> having a lot of users doing browse on the internet and
> downloading, so in that case and if the IAX used TCP port,
> so the voice will be better than using UDP (because in TCP
> the lost packets will be resend while in TCP it will not
> which will cause the voice to be cutting)?
>
> The re-sending would introduce massive latency and jitter.
> That's why UDP is used. In real-time voice, by the time the
> packet is 'missed' it's too late to retransmit it.
>
> S
>
--
_____________________________________________________________________
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
http://www.asterisk.org/hello
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
