On 01/19/2011 02:30 PM, Bryant Zimmerman wrote:
On 01/19/2011 02:05 PM, Bryant Zimmerman wrote:
 I am working on some fax tools for some of my users. I am reading the
 https://wiki.asterisk.org docs for faxing.
 Is see Application_SendFax and Application_SendeFax has one been
discondinued?
 Any feed back on using the res_fax module would be apperciated. Any
examples or
 other.

*From*: "Jason Parker" <jpar...@digium.com>
*Sent*: Wednesday, January 19, 2011 3:19 PM
There was a typo in the res_fax documentation. Application_SendeFax
should be
the correct documentation. I don't know where Application_SendFax is coming
from - it's probably old. When the next import happens, Application_SendFax
should be replaced by the correct version (then I'll try to remember to
remove
the bogus SendeFax copy).

Jason thanks for the clarification on this.

If I start my development with the res_fax_spandsp.so module. Should all
of my code be compatible with the res_fax_digium.so module? I want to be
able to get things running and tested and move to the digium supported
option in the future.

The choice of technology module is mostly irrelevant; that was the whole point of splitting res_fax out from them. If you use the applications and other features of res_fax, it won't matter which underlying technology module is loaded.

--
Kevin P. Fleming
Digium, Inc. | Director of Software Technologies
445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA
skype: kpfleming | jabber: kflem...@digium.com
Check us out at www.digium.com & www.asterisk.org

--
_____________________________________________________________________
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
              http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Reply via email to