On 01/20/2011 11:11 PM, Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
On 01/19/2011 02:30 PM, Bryant Zimmerman wrote:
On 01/19/2011 02:05 PM, Bryant Zimmerman wrote:
 I am working on some fax tools for some of my users. I am reading the
 https://wiki.asterisk.org docs for faxing.
 Is see Application_SendFax and Application_SendeFax has one been
discondinued?
 Any feed back on using the res_fax module would be apperciated. Any
examples or
 other.

*From*: "Jason Parker" <jpar...@digium.com>
*Sent*: Wednesday, January 19, 2011 3:19 PM
There was a typo in the res_fax documentation. Application_SendeFax
should be
the correct documentation. I don't know where Application_SendFax is coming from - it's probably old. When the next import happens, Application_SendFax
should be replaced by the correct version (then I'll try to remember to
remove
the bogus SendeFax copy).

Jason thanks for the clarification on this.

If I start my development with the res_fax_spandsp.so module. Should all
of my code be compatible with the res_fax_digium.so module? I want to be
able to get things running and tested and move to the digium supported
option in the future.

The choice of technology module is mostly irrelevant; that was the whole point of splitting res_fax out from them. If you use the applications and other features of res_fax, it won't matter which underlying technology module is loaded.

Well, people do get problems with the Digum FAX software, which go away when they switch to spandsp. Its best to test with the code you intend to deploy.

Steve


--
_____________________________________________________________________
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
              http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Reply via email to