jon pounder wrote:
On 09/25/2011 04:41 PM, Alex Balashov wrote:
Sometimes people get such swelled heads they need a slap back to reality - I
completely agree with him the changes were idiotic.
Obviously the comments touched a nerve with you or you would not have replied.
And let's not even THINK about mentioning the version number sequence changes!!!
Peg Leg O'Brien
On 09/25/2011 02:23 PM, Bruce B wrote:
Stop wishing for that. I like Asterisk and I will raise a voice
when I feel uncomfortable with changes.
You won't get an audience if the way you go about it is dickish.
You're being a dick, and you know you're being a dick. You're just unwilling
to admit it or intellectually engage with that.
If you were earnest and sincere about your desire to contribute constructive criticism
and effectuate change, you wouldn't start the thread with a sarcastic subject line like
"Who is the 'creative' mind behind changing Asterisk commands at CLI?" That
has a mocking, derisive inflection, and you know it has a mocking, derisive inflection.
If you expect to be taken seriously, you need to align your behaviour with your
stated objective--unless that's not actually your objective, and in fact your
objective is to be an inflammatory jerk.
--
_____________________________________________________________________
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
http://www.asterisk.org/hello
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
--
Dog is my Co-pilot
--
_____________________________________________________________________
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
http://www.asterisk.org/hello
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
