On 09/30/2011 09:53 AM, Tony Mountifield wrote: > In article <[email protected]>, > Kevin P. Fleming <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> This is why the output was changed to microseconds from milliseconds; in >> the older version, the lowest number that should be shown was 1 >> millisecond, even if the actual amount of time consumed was 10 >> microseconds (or less). The "1" numbers in the output from the older >> could easily have been "0.02", which would be closer to the output from >> the new version. > > Maybe, but that still doesn't explain why there is a factor of 2000 > between some conversions and others. And 4001, 4002 and 4003 are > remarkably like a big round number plus a tiny offset! I would agree > with the OP that the values shown look suspicious and would bear > some investigating... >
I believe the way it gets calculated was also changed a bit. You'll commonly see numbers that are near multiples of 1000. If I'm not mistaken these are the duration of a context switch (or several context switches), which means that with this output, you can guess that his kernel is probably compiled with CONFIG_HZ_250. -- _____________________________________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
