Sorry it took me a while, but I was ill for a few days J
Part1: http://pastebin.com/SZqgxh7B Part2: http://pastebin.com/gfJtVVRE In this log a call from extension 346 is made to queue 900. Queue 900 has 1 agent namely agent 300 which is logged on at extension 204. Queue 901 has 1 agent namely agent 301 which is logged on at extension 203. Agent 300 answers call from 346 and transfers this call to queue 901. After agent 301 has answered this forwarded call (caller 346) a new call from 346 arrives at queue 901. After agent 301 hangs up the call, the new call from 346 is presented immediately without any wrap-up time. Hope this logging helps... Greetings, Henry From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Warren Selby Sent: dinsdag 25 oktober 2011 18:07 To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] bug in queuemanager? On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 7:25 AM, Henry Dogger <[email protected]> wrote: Customer 200 calls to queue 900, Agent 300 answers but tells Customer 200 that he should be at Queue 901 and transfers Customer 200 (using *2) to Queue 901. Agent 301 now gets the call from Queue 901 with Customer 200, answers the calls etc. After disconnect a new call arrivers immediately from Queue 901, without any wrap-up time. This should be considered as a bug IMO. Any ideas on how to fix, workaround this problem? Please share the CLI output of such a situation, with the verbosity and debugging both set to 10 ('core set verbose 10' and 'core set debug 10' from the asterisk CLI), it may shed some light on whether this is a bug or a "feature". -- Thanks, --Warren Selby, dCAP http://www.SelbyTech.com
-- _____________________________________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
