On 11/26/2011 5:00 PM, C F wrote: > On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 7:50 AM, Gordon Henderson > <gordon+aster...@drogon.net> wrote: >> On Sat, 26 Nov 2011, Terry Brummell wrote: >> >>> Install & Configure Fail2Ban then the host will be blocked from >>> connecting. And no, it's not new. >> >> I don't need Fail2Ban, thank you. But your advice might be useful to others. > > Why is that? > Even if they don't compromise an account they are still using your > bandwidth and resources on your machine. >
How is using Fail2Ban less resource intensive then me writing (by hand) iptable rules? Also, since both methods involve the use of iptables, where exactly is the bandwidth savings? -- Jim Lucas -- _____________________________________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
