Virendra- > After reading these web links. it's pretty clear that > FreeSwitch is batter then Asterisk feature, quality > wise. But asterisk is easy to used. > > But the question is still open from my end. > > *How* *FreeSwitch can support 1000CC but asterisk not* ?
Can you define your concurrent calls? IP-to-IP, or TDM-to-IP? I assume all G.711. Please specify. -Jeff > Because FreeSwitch used XML as configuration and asterisk plan text file ? > FreeSwitch used sofia_sip and asterisk used sip ? > Asterisk is PBX and FreeSwitch is SoftSwitch ? > > > On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 9:10 PM, Gilles <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Tue, 7 Feb 2012 17:08:18 +0530, virendra bhati <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >Why FreeSwitch can handle more then 1,000CC and asterisk only 25CC ? What >> >technology FreeSwitch is used and asterisk don't. I don't know it's the >> >right or wrong but this question come to my mind... >> >> Provided Asterisk, even in release 1.8 or 10, does handle much fewer >> concurrent calls than Freeswitch, you might find the answer in those >> articles: >> >> "How does FreeSWITCH compare to Asterisk?" >> www.freeswitch.org/node/117 >> >> "Asterisk vs FreeSWITCH" >> www.richappsconsulting.com/blog/blog-detail/asterisk-vs-freeswitch/ >> >> "Asterisk vs. FreeSWITCH" >> www.anders.com/cms/266 >> >> "Open Source VoIP: Asterisk or FreeSwitch?" >> www.zdnet.com/blog/greenfield/open-source-voip-asterisk-or-freeswitch/233 >> >> "FreeSwitch vs Asterisk" >> www.dslreports.com/forum/r23246683-FreeSwitch-vs-Asterisk >> >> >> -- > Thanks and regards > > Virendra Bhati > +91-8885268942 > Software Engineer > E-mail-: [email protected] > Skype id:- virbhati2 -- _____________________________________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
