Brynjolfur- > According to this article here: > > http://anders.com/cms/266 > > the difference mainly lies in how FreeSwitchs handles open > channels in comparison with Asterisk. FS uses one thread > per channel while * keeps jumping between threads. At least > that's how I understand it.
If the difference really is 10:1, then I doubt that threads vs. linked lists completely explains it. But the difference may not be that much, as some other posts indicate. I would suggest to Virendra to make sure he's comparing identical configurations: machine type/speed/mem, same type of calls, same amount of call RTP handling (G711, no echo can, no recording, no DTMF, etc), latest versions of both softwares, and so on. That would be a good test. Since the metric in this case is concurrent calls, not CPS, it could be that for some reason, Asterisk's RTP coding isn't as efficient. -Jeff > Fra: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] På vegne af virendra > bhati > Sendt: 8. februar 2012 06:34 > Til: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion > Emne: Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk V/s FreeSwitch > > thanks Gilles, > > After reading these web links. it's pretty clear that FreeSwitch is batter > then Asterisk feature, quality wise. But > asterisk is easy to used. > > But the question is still open from my end. > > How FreeSwitch can support 1000CC but asterisk not ? > > Because FreeSwitch used XML as configuration and asterisk plan text file ? > FreeSwitch used sofia_sip and asterisk used sip ? > Asterisk is PBX and FreeSwitch is SoftSwitch ? > > On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 9:10 PM, Gilles > <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > On Tue, 7 Feb 2012 17:08:18 +0530, virendra bhati > <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> > wrote: >>Why FreeSwitch can handle more then 1,000CC and asterisk only 25CC ? What >>technology FreeSwitch is used and asterisk don't. I don't know it's the >>right or wrong but this question come to my mind... > Provided Asterisk, even in release 1.8 or 10, does handle much fewer > concurrent calls than Freeswitch, you might find the answer in those > articles: > > "How does FreeSWITCH compare to Asterisk?" > www.freeswitch.org/node/117<http://www.freeswitch.org/node/117> > > "Asterisk vs FreeSWITCH" > www.richappsconsulting.com/blog/blog-detail/asterisk-vs-freeswitch/<http://www.richappsconsulting.com/blog/blog-detail/asterisk-vs-freeswitch/> > > "Asterisk vs. FreeSWITCH" > www.anders.com/cms/266<http://www.anders.com/cms/266> > > "Open Source VoIP: Asterisk or FreeSwitch?" > www.zdnet.com/blog/greenfield/open-source-voip-asterisk-or-freeswitch/233<http://www.zdnet.com/blog/greenfield/open-source-voip-asterisk-or-freeswitch/233> > > "FreeSwitch vs Asterisk" > www.dslreports.com/forum/r23246683-FreeSwitch-vs-Asterisk<http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r23246683-FreeSwitch-vs-Asterisk> > > > > Thanks and regards > > Virendra Bhati > +91-8885268942 > Software Engineer > E-mail-: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> > Skype id:- virbhati2 -- _____________________________________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
