Didn't know everyone was down on it. It's just not a very used feature in my office environment. What's needed is a true camp-on. That's used lots at everywhere I've ever worked, and asterisk is missing it. It has an anemic call pickup that doesn't do much for us. (or even work at the moment)
Your efforts are not in vain... Nik > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of brian > Sent: Wednesday, June 09, 2004 4:36 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Sending # and Asterisk Transfer Conflict > > > The internal call parking SUCKS .. that's why tony and I > wrote valetparking but nobody seems to have liked it so we > gave up trying to give it away since everyone was so down on it. > > bkw > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users- > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stephen Rosebush > > Sent: Wednesday, June 09, 2004 2:29 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Sending # and Asterisk > Transfer Conflict > > > > I have a Grandstream ATA286 and still can not find a way of issuing > > '#' to anything with call parking enabled.. I use call > parking quite > > frequently and on my ATA device I can not issue a # to anything I > > encounter that might require it. > > > > When I push flash on my ATA device it does what it should, > It puts the > > call I was currently in on hold so I can answer an incoming call / > > make another outgoing call... Same as a landline phone... I can NOT > > transfer using FLASH. > > > > Steve > > > > Eric Wieling wrote: > > > > >What I don't understand is why people think that FLASH on a SIP > > >ATA-like device is NOT a SIP transfer. Weird. > > > > > >On Wed, 2004-06-09 at 13:09, brian wrote: > > > > > > > > >>Yet again.. *SMACK* yes it does. > > >> > > >>bkw > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >>>-----Original Message----- > > >>>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:asterisk-users- > > >>>[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stephen Rosebush > > >>>Sent: Wednesday, June 09, 2004 12:47 PM > > >>>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >>>Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Sending # and Asterisk Transfer > > >>>Conflict > > >>> > > >>>Wouldn't work on an ATA device.... > > >>> > > >>>brian wrote: > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>>>*SMACK* no you don't.... just use the native sip > transfer to park > > >>>>it. > > :) > > >>>> > > >>>>bkw > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Asterisk-Users mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > > > _______________________________________________ > Asterisk-Users mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > > _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
