|
Valetparking with some creativeness would do
campop.. hell you can do campon with just extension logic.
bkw
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, June 09, 2004 4:58
PM
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Sending #
and Asterisk Transfer Conflict
Yes! Camp-On would be a phreaking phantastic
pheature!
At 05:55 PM 6/9/2004, you wrote:
Didn't know everyone was down on
it. It's just not a very used feature in
my office
environment. What's needed is a true camp-on. That's used
lots
at everywhere I've ever worked, and asterisk is missing it. It
has an
anemic call pickup that doesn't do much for us. (or even work at
the moment)
Your efforts are not in
vain...
Nik
> -----Original
Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf
Of brian
> Sent: Wednesday, June 09, 2004 4:36 PM
> To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users]
Sending # and Asterisk Transfer Conflict
>
>
> The
internal call parking SUCKS .. that's why tony and I
> wrote
valetparking but nobody seems to have liked it so we
> gave up trying
to give it away since everyone was so down on it.
>
>
bkw
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users-
> >
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stephen Rosebush
> > Sent:
Wednesday, June 09, 2004 2:29 PM
> > To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users]
Sending # and Asterisk
> Transfer Conflict
> >
> >
I have a Grandstream ATA286 and still can not find a way of issuing
>
> '#' to anything with call parking enabled.. I use call
> parking
quite
> > frequently and on my ATA device I can not issue a # to
anything I
> > encounter that might require it.
>
>
> > When I push flash on my ATA device it does what it should,
> It puts the
> > call I was currently in on hold so I can
answer an incoming call /
> > make another outgoing call... Same
as a landline phone... I can NOT
> > transfer using FLASH.
>
>
> > Steve
> >
> > Eric Wieling
wrote:
> >
> > >What I don't understand is why people
think that FLASH on a SIP
> > >ATA-like device is NOT a SIP
transfer. Weird.
> > >
> > >On Wed, 2004-06-09
at 13:09, brian wrote:
> > >
> > >
> >
>>Yet again.. *SMACK* yes it does.
> > >>
> >
>>bkw
> > >>
> > >>
> >
>>
> > >>>-----Original Message-----
> >
>>>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
[mailto:asterisk-users-
> > >>>[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Stephen Rosebush
> > >>>Sent: Wednesday, June
09, 2004 12:47 PM
> > >>>To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >>>Subject: Re:
[Asterisk-Users] Sending # and Asterisk Transfer
> >
>>>Conflict
> > >>>
> >
>>>Wouldn't work on an ATA device....
> >
>>>
> > >>>brian wrote:
> >
>>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
>
> >>>>*SMACK* no you don't.... just use the native sip
> transfer to park
> > >>>>it.
> >
:)
> > >>>>
> > >>>>bkw
>
> >>>>
> > >>>>
> >
>>>>
> > >>>>
> > >
>
> >
> > >
> >
> >
_______________________________________________
> > Asterisk-Users
mailing list
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
> >
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
Asterisk-Users mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>
>
_______________________________________________
Asterisk-Users
mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To
UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Best Regards,
Karl J. Vesterling
E-Mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yahoo Messenger: karl_vesterling
ICQ:
1548052
AOL Instant Messenger: n2vqm
Telephone:
Washington DC: (202) 448-3009 Extension 0
Annapolis
MD: (240) 524-6706 Extension 0
Seattle WA: (360) 516-1822
Extension 0
Niagara Falls NY: (716) 286-9175 Extension
0
Buffalo NY: (716) 608-1121 Extension 0
United Kingdom:
0870 3403428 Extension 0
|
