We set +s for more than a day the spam bots kept coming... So +s wasn't working. We did -s so you could atleast see the channel topic telling you to register.
I added it back today but that doesn't solve the problem. And you didn't break my bubble you just were not there to see that +s didn't do a damn thing. bkw ----- Original Message ----- From: "Michael Sandee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, June 19, 2004 1:16 PM Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] IRC > Sorry to break your bubble... > but: No it isn't. > > These bots come from owned hosts, and get the channel name from the > server info which happily lists all non-secret channels. > The operators actively battle the bots by k-lining them. (Or well, they > are supposed to do this slave job for us atleast, it's the only thing > they have to do apart from spying on us). > > These bots do NOT cache the channel names. They get them after > connecting to the server. (Yes I know... we reversed some of them recently) > > P.S. Since you are a guy with ops YOU made the mistake by not having the > channel +s in the first place. > > And thanks for making it +s now, lets hope it gets resolved now for the > common good. > > Regards, > > Mike > > Brian K. West wrote: > > >Its wayyyyyyyyy toolate for +s > > > >bkw > >----- Original Message ----- > >From: "Michael Sandee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Sent: Saturday, June 19, 2004 12:41 PM > >Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] IRC > > > > > > > > > >>Damn dude, you are a worse troll than me... :P > >> > >>The fact is, freenode is so laggy with, but not restricted to, nickserv > >>registrations... that the thing called "perform" in most irc clients is > >>messed up, when using it to join some channels. Which can be useful when > >>you are not on a very stable or 24/7 connection, such as dial-up or > >>hong-kong based broadband connections ;) > >> > >>Other than that, it sucks to have it this way... but I know it is a > >>problem with the spambots. Having the channel +s might be a better way > >>to "fight" spambots, without putting a restriction on the users. > >> > >>Jeremy McNamara wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >>>Steve Underwood wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>>Hi, > >>>> > >>>>I figured it out. Most IRC channels requiring some authentication > >>>>give a minute's latitude to allow for slow response from nickserv. It > >>>>seems #asterisk is not doing that. You really must wait for nickserv > >>>>to say you are registered before you issue a /join #asterisk. > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > >>>You can't login to an ssh session until you are authenticated, why > >>>would IRC be any different? > >>> > >>> > >>>Jeremy McNamara > >>> > >>> > >>_______________________________________________ > >>Asterisk-Users mailing list > >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > >>To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > >> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > >> > >> > >> > >_______________________________________________ > >Asterisk-Users mailing list > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > >To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Asterisk-Users mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
