That's a technical answer. Try to explain that one to a real "user" of the system and not a technical individual.
------------------------ > If you go by logic, you're actually wrong about this: > Dial is supposed to DIAL an extension. If an error condition exists, it > goes to Priority+101. Error conditions are defined as anything that > will prevent the phone from ringing... Such as off-hook (busy), or the > sip device being unreachable. Dial will continue with the next priority > on time-out (which generally happens when the device isn't answered). > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Simon Brown [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2004 6:44 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Busy message > > > > > > This should be listed as a bug - it is not logical to go to > > busy, when in fact the extension is unavailable. > > > > Simon > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > > Eric Wieling > > Sent: Wednesday, 23 June 2004 8:43 > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Busy message > > > > *I* think it should go to unavailable, but it has always gone to busy. > > > > On Tue, 2004-06-22 at 16:34, Simon Brown wrote: > > > Then shouldn't Asterisk be changed so it jumps to > > "unavailable" in the > > > dial plan? Surely this would be the "correct" way of working. > > > > > > Simon Brown > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric > > > Wieling > > > Sent: Wednesday, 23 June 2004 0:47 > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Busy message > > > > > > On Mon, 2004-06-21 at 23:26, Simon Brown wrote: > > > > When I dial a SIP phone which is specified in the > > sip.conf, but the > > > > phone is not connected, Asterisk gives the message "The user at > > > > Extension XXX is on the phone ...." > > > > Shouldn't the message be the unavailable message? > > > > Is there something wrong with my set up or is this a > > "bug" with Asterisk? > > > > > > No. It's just the way Asterisk works. > > -- > > Eric Wieling * BTEL Consulting * 504-899-1387 x2111 > > "In a related story, the IRS has recently ruled that the cost > > of Windows upgrades can NOT be deducted as a gambling loss." > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Asterisk-Users mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/aster> isk-users > > To > > UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > > > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > _______________________________________________ > Asterisk-Users mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > > > _______________________________________________ > Asterisk-Users mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ---------------End of Original Message----------------- _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
