[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Tue, 2004-06-22 at 19:31, Aaron J. Angel wrote: >> What would the contents of CAUSECODE be when set? I can't find >> documentation of this anywhere. > ... > Also see: > http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-dev/2004-June/004534.html
And now that I look at the link, I have to disagree with the arguments about the macro args. Should one not be able to expect an optional parameter be left blank if not defined? I know of no other significant implementation that leaves macro arguments unchecked like this...I really think this should be looked at again; how does one reopen a bug (or does one?). I can hardly imagine there are only a handful of people that see benefit in an unclean workspace when writing macros in extensions.conf. _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
