Hmm... I couldn't get my Macro to work and your comments have me thinking I'm stupid again. I think I'm going to setup another test bed and wack the crap out of this one... next question to ask the developers... why wouldn't they include the system extensions. That would make the Macro implementation more complete.
Don't think this type of extension vs this other type of extension. Think flow control vs exception handling. AbsoluteTimeout is listed in the wiki as flow control, but it is actually an exception device and the 'T' extension is the exception handler. Most applications, not just Macro, simply exit upon encountering an exception, thus, when AbsoluteTimeout exceptions happen during Macro execution, you are dropped out of the macro into the context that called the macro.
It's not a matter of not including something, its a matter of how something is implemented.
Thanks, Chris
_______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
