> Has anyone else successfully got such an arrangement to work, or is > there any plans to make the QSIG messages more parsable (maybe exposed > as variables in the dialplan)? Or at least not have the name overflow > the number? :)
QSIG passes callername and other variables by a mechanism that asterisk cannot interpret at the moment. It sends them either in a information element in the setup message for the call or in an additional facility message after the fact. Right now asterisk cannot interpret those facility messages to get the data out of them, so that's probably the reason why you are getting garbled data. If anyone has any info on interpreting the FACILTIY message/IE we could probably get something put together to interpret it. Matthew Fredrickson _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users