On Fri, 2004-09-10 at 04:50, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > QSIG passes callername and other variables by a mechanism that asterisk > cannot interpret at the moment. It sends them either in a information > element in the setup message for the call or in an additional facility > message after the fact. Right now asterisk cannot interpret those facility > messages to get the data out of them, so that's probably the reason why > you are getting garbled data. > > If anyone has any info on interpreting the FACILTIY message/IE we could > probably get something put together to interpret it.
Parsing would be a nice to have, but I'd settle for FACILITY not nuking the callerid entirely. If FACILITY messages are unparsable, shouldn't they be dropped by *? (I can ask the PBX provider for documentation of the FACILITY they are sending, but it seems like a bug to me that a long message causes the _number_ in a seperate IE to be dropped.) Thanks. -- David Zanetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Team Leader, Systems Administration +64-4-8032233 +64-21-402260
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
