On Tue, 12 Oct 2004, Steven Critchfield wrote: > On Tue, 2004-10-12 at 12:32 -0600, Michael Loftis wrote: > > No I hate those highpoints. Using Standard IDE, the Promise 'RAID' is > > disabled. We have a SCSI box here that's been purchased for the PBX > > permanent home, but if this is how the Zaptel hardware makes a box behave, > > interrupt loss causing severe disk corruption on a box that is sitting > > around doing *NOTHING* then something is severely wrong either with the > > hardware, or the drivers. The box was entirely idle. Only thing it's ever > > done is sit, it's handled a total of 100 test calls as I've been setting it > > up and screwed itself up pretty royally twice now. > > Then you show how little you have learned about the hardware and the > system in general. ALL Zapata based hardware generates 1000 interupts a > second regardless of activity. It does so because a choice was made that > the complexity and cost involved in adding buffers and hardware to > service those buffers was too much. It was deemed that under most > situations, a PC is capable of handling that kind of load.
I thought the very shallow buffers (8 bits I think) were selected to keep the voice path latency low. Anyway, 1kHz shoulr really _really_ not be a problem. I have run user space code at 1kHz to talk to a can bus. From user space. The jitter was really low even though the system was busy logging away. No instabilities there. For data loggers 1kHz is not that uncommon. Peter _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
