>Why don't you make your disdain known to Broadvoice, rather than >Asterisk users? To claim that someone opens a security hole by
For the same reason this was originally posted to the asterisk-user list. >accepting a verified patch via email, is the same as claiming that you >never have a security hole just because you download from "trusted" >sites. Webservers can be hacked, you know. And not every >buffer-overflow will lead to a security issue -- many just crash the >system. Well sure, you can go hack a webserver, that's true, and whoever got hacked would get lambasted. However I think anyone will agree that it's a tad bit more difficult than just sending an email using your favourite email program. It's not the same at all, and I think you understand this. >Could we please get back on topic? Sure, what's the topic? Isn't it something to do with a patch for asterisk? -Michael _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
