Ditto. There's another very clear advantage to OpenVPN over IPsec, and that's the fact that many firewalls are hard to run IPsec through, but OpenVPN, using a single ephemeral UDP link, will work just fine.
I believe that the original poster is not concerned with getting it through a Linksys router at home, and that he has a highi degree of control over which hardware is in the trunk path. I could be wrong, but that's what it sounded like to me.
I just tried to get it working last night, and I found it (OpenVPN) no easier as a VPN solution than OpenSWAN was, either in server setup and understanding, or client setup and use. My users and myself are running the XP SP2 and Win2K (updated) MS builtin client into the network through one of those hated Linksys routers, with no problems whatsoever. In the end, I decided that I'd rather stick with the open standards, than wait and hope that the OpenVPN proprietary software became a de-facto standard (isn't that what you all hated Microsoft for? But I digress...)
For a single point-to-point link, like the poster requested, with Linux on both ends, there is no reason I can tell to go a proprietary route when IPSec works just fine and comes with the 2.6 kernel (or can be fitted on a 2.4 kernel just fine).
Greg
Greg _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
