On Fri, 03 Dec 2004 01:45:12 -0600, Steven Critchfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, 2004-12-03 at 17:22 +1100, Alan Ingleby wrote: > > I just tried Xorcom Rapid, but it looks bloody complicated, and fairly > > stripped back. > > Stripped is a VERY good thing. Should try debian at some point. [..] > A large portion of linux elitists use debian or some off shoot of > debian.
Ahh. Xorcom Rapid is based on Debian.. Maybe I need to knuckle down and learn it... :-( > With 3.6g chips out in the market and 3.8g announced, 256m memory being > nearly entry level at best, and 40gb drives haven't been made in a while > now, you don't have a high spec machine. Not shabby for the needs and > probably plenty adequate, but be aware of the landscape before thinking > you are on the high end. Hehe.. This is a brand new machine! I just had it custom built!.. (I asked for minimum specs on all components deliberately).. I refer to it as high spec, because the Xorcom docs say minimum specs are P2/200.. I also wanted to set up this machine to be our network firewall/nat.... Our existing firewall runs linux on a p90, and runs fine, but I figured it's time to upgrade.. Will this cause any problems for *? Do you know of a source for * config files, such that I can set up the box to allow my to at least connect a grandstream bt100 to it, and get sample responses?, and get it to dial out on the FXO (TDM400) card I have in it? Alan _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
