On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 15:26:15 -0600, Steven Critchfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > While it will probably be handled when you move out of outlook, please > wrap your lines at a reasonable length.
Please tell me that Gmail is fine... If it isn't, I'll have to find something else. > As of right now, I don't think the sangoma card supports any codec > conversions and asterisk support at the same time. I say this as it > supports the zaptel api and therefore should work similarly as the TE > cards from Digium as far as asterisk is concerned. > > Also I don't see that the Wanpipe hardware supports codec translations > either. > > I may be wrong on that though. The AudioCode device seems to be the closest thing, but that's a gateway. Still looking into it though, as well as what the Sangoma offerings can do. > It wasn't so much that your question was bad, but it didn't show that > you had the proper understanding of the question. If you had stated > which sites/URLs you had searched through to come to the conclusion that > there might be a reason the list would be more authoritative that those > URLs, it would have shown effort and therefore reason to be respected. > You will find that even in supposedly rough groups, effort is respected. > Few like freeloaders. Your question seemed like it was only about you > having others do your work. The extra couple of lines you would have > typed to show a bit of your previous effort would have sufficed to > eliminate that appearance. I understand, but the hardware list and the wiki I figured were known by all. Anyway, I'll be sure to do that in the future. > I'm not sure the disclaimer itself shows anything other than a stupid > policy by your employer. At some point your employer should actually > seek legal advice as to whether or not the disclaimer does any good at > all. I could disagree with it and therefore not be bound by it. As the > majority of the world isn't in any form of business agreements with your > employer, there isn't much you could do to compel others to abide by it. I'm no lawyer, and can't comment on that. I just find it sorta annoying when I send email to personal contacts from work and they get the disclaimer. > When it comes down to it, reasonable hardware should handle decent > amounts of codec translations. If you are trying to stuff more than the > suggested amount of TE hardware in a box and do codec translation, then > you need to rethink the cost of failure. If you are dependant on 12 T1s > (value pulled from thin air, not necessarily related), You should see > about spitting it out over 3 boxes so at most you only lose 4 T1s at a > time. For most companies that rely on the phones, losing 1/3rd of the > production is pretty expensive, losing all of production is not > tolerable. Any card that does the codec translation for you will > probably make you more likely to consolidate too many interfaces into > one machine. Yeah, that's why I was hoping there would be cards that do the work. If it comes down to it, I'll just go that route and build many boxes with less TE cards. Anyway, I checked all around in the options of Gmail and I don't see anywhere to turn on or off HTML email, and I don't see anywhere that mentions linewrapping. If there is a problem, feel free to contact me off-list and let me know. I'll try my best to fix whatever is wrong. -- Dana _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
