On Thu, 2005-01-20 at 17:15 -0500, Dana Olson wrote: > On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 15:26:15 -0600, Steven Critchfield > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > While it will probably be handled when you move out of outlook, please > > wrap your lines at a reasonable length. > > Please tell me that Gmail is fine... If it isn't, I'll have to find > something else.
So far so good. Others around here use gmail. I just have no use for their user agreement. But then again, I have my own domain to fall back to if I so choose. > > It wasn't so much that your question was bad, but it didn't show that > > you had the proper understanding of the question. If you had stated > > which sites/URLs you had searched through to come to the conclusion that > > there might be a reason the list would be more authoritative that those > > URLs, it would have shown effort and therefore reason to be respected. > > You will find that even in supposedly rough groups, effort is respected. > > Few like freeloaders. Your question seemed like it was only about you > > having others do your work. The extra couple of lines you would have > > typed to show a bit of your previous effort would have sufficed to > > eliminate that appearance. > > I understand, but the hardware list and the wiki I figured were known > by all. Anyway, I'll be sure to do that in the future. Well... many show up here with out doing any work at all. Those links should be known by all. > > When it comes down to it, reasonable hardware should handle decent > > amounts of codec translations. If you are trying to stuff more than the > > suggested amount of TE hardware in a box and do codec translation, then > > you need to rethink the cost of failure. If you are dependant on 12 T1s > > (value pulled from thin air, not necessarily related), You should see > > about spitting it out over 3 boxes so at most you only lose 4 T1s at a > > time. For most companies that rely on the phones, losing 1/3rd of the > > production is pretty expensive, losing all of production is not > > tolerable. Any card that does the codec translation for you will > > probably make you more likely to consolidate too many interfaces into > > one machine. > > Yeah, that's why I was hoping there would be cards that do the work. > If it comes down to it, I'll just go that route and build many boxes > with less TE cards. You know you shouldn't exceed 2 cards in a single machine. And with machines being soo cheap right now, you really should consider not going more than 1 card per machine. My company just bought another Dell to hold a T100P card for just over $700. 2.4ghz P4, half gig ram, 160gig sata drive, rack mount 1u. Granted that machine will be devoted to a single customer of ours, I'm sure it could handle more than a single T1 interface and do conversions just fine. > Anyway, I checked all around in the options of Gmail and I don't see > anywhere to turn on or off HTML email, and I don't see anywhere that > mentions linewrapping. If there is a problem, feel free to contact me > off-list and let me know. I'll try my best to fix whatever is wrong. gmail seems to have done the trick -- Steven Critchfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
