On Thu, 31 Mar 2005 10:00:12 -0500, David Brodbeck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Brian Capouch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > My understanding is that to an extent when we buy Sangoma > > we're putting the dagger to Digium. > > If anything "puts the dagger" to Digium it'll be their own inability to > engineer reliable hardware. > > I appreciate what Digium has done for Asterisk, but reliability expectations > for phone equipment are extremely high. I sympathize with people who need > hardware that doesn't need to be restarted once a week just to do its job > properly. If Digium can't deliver on those reliability expectations, and do > it soon, people are going to switch to companies that can. And you know > what? I don't blame them.
The Digium boards need to be restarted once a week? Please clarify this. I was dead set on getting in a Sangoma A104 for a production Asterisk box, but then I read this thread and felt that it didn't matter so much what I would order... And so I was deciding to stick with Digium. And then I read your scary comment. I've currently got a Digium board filled with 3 T1s, but it hasn't been under heavy use right yet, due to my attention being pulled from * and put onto SER+AudioCodes devices for other applications, and I haven't had to restart yet. Is this going to change? What's the deal? Please clarify your statement for me, as I need reliability as well. Thanks. _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
