On 5/29/05, Tzafrir Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, May 28, 2005 at 06:34:23AM +1000, Gonzalo Servat wrote: [snip] > > If Asterisk allowed me to configure up to 10 ringing patterns, I could > > probably cover most of the ringing patterns being detected, but > > unfortunately there is a limit of 3 which means 50% (or more) of the > > calls are coming in under a distinctive ring pattern not configured in > > Asterisk, and hence going to the default context. > > Is there any deeper reason for that limitation, other than "it didn't > bother anybody enough"?
I wonder that myself, but I have no idea why the limit is imposed. Any Asterisk developers willing to answer that for us? > > Does anyone have any suggestions/ideas/etc on how to resolve this issue? > > Could you post here some ring patterns you get? A distinctive ring can > identify a pattern that is "similar" enough to an existing pattern. You're right, some that were not defined were close enough to the ringing pattern and did match, but even with 3 popular distinctive rings defined there were still calls that were coming up with a new distinctive ring pattern and not getting matched by the defined dring patterns. Some of the ones I frequently saw were: 334,147,0 383,195,0 334,0,0 336,348,0 334,146,0 All the above patterns are for the same distinctive ring number. Regards, Gonzalo _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
