On Saturday 11 June 2005 11:35, Tracy Phillips wrote: > > That is *precisely* why the RFC is worded "should" -- it is optional. If > > the RFC said "must" then it is required. RFCs are worded very carefully > > as a general rule.
> I am just glad everyone doesn't have that attitude about RFCs. I'm not sure I understand -- I'm not making this up, RFCs use "must" and "should" very carefully. The latter is a guideline, and the former is a rule. I'm trying to find the link describing this but it's eluding me at the moment. I think this is a VERY good thing; RFCs are like the laws of the internet; they should not be open to interpretation since they define the protocols used to interoperate. -A. _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
