Nice, I can't even get my laptops clock to work properly!
On 3/6/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks, dude. Excellent information on this list, as per usual. Now if I > could > just get the clock on the motherboard fixed. Seems like its losing its > settings > a lot but the battery looks OK. I think I have ntpd working OK in its place. > > Peter M. > > > There are definite benefits to a dual/multi CPU machine. The actual > > asterisk program isn't multi > > threaded so it won't utilize more then one but, when other processes kick > > off like transcoding, > > festival, comedian the OS will utilize the other CPU(s) to distribute the > > load. SO there is a definite > > benefit just not as much as one would totally want. > > > > The only time there is no benefit is when you have no transcoding and only > > the core asterisk > > process running. But this is highly unusual. > > > > Mike > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > *This message was transferred with a trial version of CommuniGate(tm) > > Pro* > > So running [EMAIL PROTECTED] on a dual processor P2 333 system is still > > a waste of > > processing power? CentOS does recognize both processors and loads the > > SMP kernel. Is there any benefit at all? > > > > Peter M. > > > > > > Maybe crazy enough that it will actually work. It amazes me sometimes > > what ideas u come up with!! Some related news: > > > > 1) IAX is multithreaded in head now, so should work better on dual > > processors than SIP, unless you're using the "other" asterisk sip > > stack. Also, a side benefit, silence suppression on IAX will probably > > come soon. > > > > On 3/2/06, Jim Van Meggelen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Let me run something that's been floating about in my noggin by > > everyone: > > > > Given that Asterisk does not make use of dual core CPUs or dual > > processors, > > I was contemplating whether running Asterisk in two (or more) VMWare > > sessions on a system might actually allow for more total performance. > > For > > example, set up one VM to handle incoming lines, echo cancellation and > > all > > sets, and then set up the other VM to handle VoIP, including > > transcoding. > > > > A bit kludgy, to be sure, but would VMWare allow for both cores/CPUs to > > be > > more fully utilized? > > > > Very possibly not practical, but it's been floating about my head for a > > bit > > and I figured I'd send it out into the ether to see what thoughts might > > come > > back. > > > > So . . . thoughts? > > > > Jim. > > ******************************************************** > Peter MacFarlane, ACP > Network Administration & Programming > Target Call Center/ Message Centre P.E.I. > ***************************************************************** > OpenBSD's PF Firewall: Now available with CARP Failover. > Nothing to do with fish, but everything to do with security! > ***************************************************************** > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
