This is what's needed:

http://www.leapsecond.com/pages/atomic-bill/

What? Too geeky for you?

Jim.

--
Jim Van Meggelen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/au/2177

"A child is the ultimate startup, and I have three. 
This makes me rich."
                    Guy Kawasaki
--


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Shidan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: March 6, 2006 2:03 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [on-asterisk] Brainstorming dual-core and Asterisk
> 
> Nice, I can't even get my laptops clock to work properly!
> 
> On 3/6/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Thanks, dude.  Excellent information on this list, as per 
> usual.  Now 
> > if I could just get the clock on the motherboard fixed. 
> Seems like its 
> > losing its settings a lot but the battery looks OK.  I 
> think I have ntpd working OK in its place.
> >
> > Peter M.
> >
> > > There are definite benefits to a dual/multi CPU machine. 
> The actual 
> > > asterisk program isn't multi threaded so it won't utilize 
> more then 
> > > one but, when other processes kick off like transcoding, 
> festival, 
> > > comedian the OS will utilize the other CPU(s) to 
> distribute the load. SO there is a definite benefit just not 
> as much as one would totally want.
> > >
> > > The only time there is no benefit is when you have no transcoding 
> > > and only the core asterisk process running. But this is 
> highly unusual.
> > >
> > > Mike
> > >
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > >     *This message was transferred with a trial version of 
> CommuniGate(tm) Pro*
> > >     So running [EMAIL PROTECTED] on a dual processor P2 333 system 
> is still a waste of
> > >     processing power?  CentOS does recognize both 
> processors and loads the
> > >     SMP kernel. Is there any benefit at all?
> > >
> > >     Peter M.
> > >
> > >
> > >     Maybe crazy enough that it will actually work. It 
> amazes me sometimes
> > >     what ideas u come up with!! Some related news:
> > >
> > >     1) IAX is multithreaded in head now, so should work 
> better on dual
> > >     processors than SIP, unless you're using the "other" 
> asterisk sip
> > >     stack. Also,  a side benefit, silence suppression on 
> IAX will probably
> > >     come soon.
> > >
> > >     On 3/2/06, Jim Van Meggelen 
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > >     Let me run something that's been floating about in my 
> noggin by everyone:
> > >
> > >     Given that Asterisk does not make use of dual core 
> CPUs or dual processors,
> > >     I was contemplating whether running Asterisk in two 
> (or more) VMWare
> > >     sessions on a system might actually allow for more 
> total performance. For
> > >     example, set up one VM to handle incoming lines, echo 
> cancellation and all
> > >     sets, and then set up the other VM to handle VoIP, 
> including transcoding.
> > >
> > >     A bit kludgy, to be sure, but would VMWare allow for 
> both cores/CPUs to be
> > >     more fully utilized?
> > >
> > >     Very possibly not practical, but it's been floating 
> about my head for a bit
> > >     and I figured I'd send it out into the ether to see 
> what thoughts might come
> > >     back.
> > >
> > >     So . . . thoughts?
> > >
> > >     Jim.
> >
> > ********************************************************
> > Peter MacFarlane, ACP
> > Network Administration &  Programming
> > Target Call Center/ Message Centre P.E.I.
> > *****************************************************************
> > OpenBSD's PF Firewall: Now available with CARP Failover.
> > Nothing to do with fish, but everything to do with security!
> > *****************************************************************
> >
> >
> >
> > 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional 
> > commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For 
> additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> 
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 268.2.0/275 - Release 
> Date: 06/03/2006
>  
> 

-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 268.2.0/275 - Release Date: 06/03/2006
 

Reply via email to