Much appreciated. These are the kind of comments we're looking for. Interesting that a PII does so well. I guess means that my dual processor PII 333 motherboard should work for quite a while. If only the MB clock didn't lose it on reboot.
I'm not a large Dialogic fan myself, having seen what their support has been like in the past. Peter M. > On Friday 16 June 2006 08:35, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I found out what the competition means by Digium cards being inefficient. > > Their phone cards (proprietary) have P4 processors built it. Therefore, > > you COULD run the server on a PII bacause the phone cards are doing most of > > the work. This is probably why Windows 2003 server works well for this > > server. The cards would take away programming flexibility though wouldn't > > they? Software is easier to update that firmware. > > That's all meaningless. I ran Asterisk on a P90 (before MMX) -- granted it > could only handle a couple of calls with gsm transcoding, but it worked. A > P2 is *tons* of processor for basic PBX and transcode use. > > Dialogic made (makes) this argument but their on-board processors are *very* > weak. > > -A. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >
