Hello Jim:

Yes, indeed I am running Fedora on my development box, though its co-located at 
a data centre and I run another two boxes that is Ubuntu based.    The reason 
for Fedora was quite simple.  My data centres admins are Fedora gurus and they 
prefer fedora over anything else.  So it was a judgment call, based on their 
experience in case they needed to add or remove something from the machine - 
and that is what the guys are more comfortable with.

However my preferred choice is Ubuntu.   The machines running Ubuntu did not 
need a reboot for more than a year.  They've been finely tweaked and tuned for 
optimal performance.   I'm prejudiced towards Red Hat for different reasons, 
but am willing to keep an open mind.   Is the CentOS team an off shoot of 
Redhat, or are they a completely separate independent entity from Red Hat?

Normally all that you say is gospel to me & I listen to it heart and soul :).   
  However...  the question I would have for you...  is if you were to decide 
whether CentOS or Ubuntu...  which one would you choose?    The only reason I 
chose Ubuntu is because I felt it was a fantastic flavour of Debian - and all 
my Asterisk servers have performed flawlessly compared to any other Linux 
version (I tried)....  but I do have to confess I have NOT used CentOS yet!

Waiting for your enlightenment!

Cheers!
Reza.


----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Jim Van Meggelen 
  To: 'Reza - Asterisk Enthusiast' 
  Sent: Monday, August 28, 2006 10:37 AM
  Subject: RE: [on-asterisk] Asterisk Voice Mail not going through.


  Reza,

  I noticed that you mentioned Fedora, and I thought I'd let you know that you 
should have your folks look into CentOS. It is also Redhat-based, but where 
Fedora is considered by Redhat to be a sort of experimental bleeding-edge 
version of Redhat, CentOS is based on Redhat Enterprise Linux. The CentOS team 
is so good that they are often ahead of Redhat in terms of deploying patches 
and updates, but otherwise they stick to RHEL very closely.

  Highly recommended.

  Jim

Reply via email to