I'd say Trixbox if you are to chose between Trixbox or AsteriskNow. Simply,
because Trixbox is bundled with other packages and there are lots of scripts
for it out there but AsteriskNow does not have that big pool of supporters yet.
Personally, if AsteriskNow does some packaging and does good documentation and
provides a better active forum then I would rather go with AsteriskNow because
then you will be able to try the latest version of Asterisk. Trixbox people do
not plan to deploy Asterisk 1.4 anytime soon and that's not good enough for
me(Well, it's not only Trixbox thing; it's mostly a freepbx thing). But
AsteriskNow GUI is not as good as FreePBX is now.> Date: Tue, 22 May 2007
10:15:27 -0400> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> CC:
[email protected]> Subject: Re: [on-asterisk] Im a newbie> > Trixbox is easy to
install, but I would say more difficult to learn from> as the configuration
files that make it all work are more complicated> than the ones that come with
a clean asterisk install.> > I haven't looked at AsteriskNOW yet.> > If you'd
like a really clean and simple pre-built asterisk system to> learn from, I'd
recommend running AstLinux inside vmplayer and a> softphone.> > If you're also
new to Linux and editing text files on a Unix system> though,
Trixbox/AsteriskNOW would probably be a better starting point.> > Cheers,> spd>
> On Tue, 22 May 2007, David LEWIS wrote:> > > Hello fine gentlemen> >> >
Asterisk NOW or Trixbox?> >> >
---------------------------------------------------------------------> To
unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL
PROTECTED]>
_________________________________________________________________
Explore the seven wonders of the world
http://search.msn.com/results.aspx?q=7+wonders+world&mkt=en-US&form=QBRE
