On Fri, 2007-11-02 at 18:04 -0400, Philip Mullis wrote: > What criteria are you using to validate what is considered good?
Good would be a device which can handle multiple (around 15) UDP SIP registrations to a remote server and properly maintain the state of these connections while the phone and/or the server issue keep-alive messages. I'm amazed at how many devices, even expensive high-end ones, can not do UDP NAT properly. This device should handle an office of up to 15 people with both computers and phones. Other than that we do not require any special features though QOS support would be nice bonus but not required. John > > Ability to have large amounts of states? > High pps? > large packet handling? > Qos on the device? > > > John Lange wrote: > > We've been having this ongoing struggle trying to nail down a suitable > > firewall/router device for use at small businesses who are using hosted > > VoIP. > > > > The criteria for the device is: > > > > - Works with multiple VoIP devices connecting to a remote server > > - off the shelf deployment (no "roll-your-own" devices). > > - Price point suitable for small office (less than $200) > > - Available in Canada > > > > This has been surprisingly difficult. > > > > John > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
