Asterisk 10 has a number of major improvements as several things where
rewritten, it has extended support for a wider range of codes lots of
focus on the hd stuff, better performance and stability. It now also
supports video conferencing more extensively and has a new conference
application all together that no longer requires the use of the dahdi
timer.
FreePBX is used by loads of people, its great for people that want a
gui, however big note to self there.. you have to button it up/make it
safe. There have been a massive amount of boxes hacked over the years
with things like freepbx/trixbox etc.. installed on them because they
where not buttoned up so to say :)
In a small office environment your not really going to see any killer
differences with 1.8/1.10 unless you get into conferencing/ alternate
codecs.
Hope that helps.
Regards
Philip Mullis
On 08/07/2012 10:22 PM, Steven McCann wrote:
Hi All,
I'm setting up a new phone system for a small organization (about 15
extensions). I'm using the FreePBX distro. There is two main versions of
the FreePBX distro out right now - one with Asterisk 1.8, and one with 1.10.
I'm curious if there are any pros/cons to deploying 1.10 VS 1.8? 1.10
sounds like it may have some fancy new features, however 1.8 I think is an
LTS release..
Does anyone have any experience with 1.8 VS 1.10 or even just with FreePBX?
Any advice or feedback?
Thanks,
Steve
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]