Kristian Kielhofner wrote: > On 3/27/08, Darrick Hartman (lists) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I bet lighttpd would handle this more gracefully than mini_httpd does, >> but not sure that it's worth the extra weight in the image. > > Possibly, but yes it would have to be separate because it doesn't > support SSL. That's the nice thing about mini_httpd - it does :).
What do you mean? It sure support SSL. It just needs to be compiled as such. (adding --with-openssl --with-openssl-libs=/location) >> The dsnmasq.static file is a good way to specify the IP address given to >> a specific MAC address. That's the main reason I added it. > > That's what we're trying to avoid. The idea is to be able to pull a > phone out of a box, plug it in, and have it work. Ideally you would > have a pre-configured extension range to give out to unknown devices. > That would get the phone registered and "working". You could then > adjust outbound dialing permissions, etc by changing it's context, > dialplan, etc later. It would be pretty cool. Interesting. Perhaps we can add this sort of feature to a future release with a completely revised/reworked interface. Darrick -- Darrick Hartman DJH Solutions, LLC http://www.djhsolutions.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace _______________________________________________ Astlinux-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/astlinux-users Donations to support AstLinux are graciously accepted via PayPal to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
