Darrick Hartman (lists) wrote: >> Yeah... I realized shortly after I send that I was thinking of >> tighthttpd (or whatever that other ACME server was). Maybe we should >> be looking at lighttpd. How much bigger are the binaries? >> > > That actually depends on how many modules we were to include. The > actually lighttpd binary is only 100K larger. > > I'm updating the package quickly (almost done). I'll be committing the > update shortly.
The lighttpd binary is 144k The modules (if we include all of the modules) add about 600k. We probably don't need all of the modules. Long term, if we want to add provisioning support etc, we'll want to go this way as it offers alot more options than mini_httpd. -- Darrick Hartman DJH Solutions, LLC http://www.djhsolutions.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace _______________________________________________ Astlinux-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/astlinux-users Donations to support AstLinux are graciously accepted via PayPal to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
