John Novack wrote:
> 
> Lonnie Abelbeck wrote:
>> On Apr 18, 2010, at 8:38 AM, John Novack wrote:
>>
>>   
>>>> I see the problem, the /etc/init.d/sshd creates the line:
>>>>
>>>> Subsystem       sftp    /usr/sbin/sftp-server" >> /tmp/etc/ssh/sshd_config
>>>>
>>>> but the sftp server is located in "/usr/libexec/sftp-server".
>>>>
>>>>       
> <snip>
>> Please confirm that this fixes your problem.
>>
>>   
> It does, in fact fix the issue
> 
> Again, many thanks.
> As to 0.7.2, any idea when it will be available? I may postpone a couple 
> of builds and upgrades if it is right around the corner.
> 
> BTW - somewhere on the doc site, I saw a reference to 0.5 and upgrading 
> to 0.6-0.7
> The 0.5 versions I have working cannot be upgraded easily/remotely, as 
> the runnix boot partition lacks a label, and I have been led to believe 
> that is necessary.
> Don't know if many are using 0.5, but  that could mislead them

John,

Glad that fixed your issue.  I'm planning to wait until after Digium 
releases the next version of Asterisk which should be in the next week 
or so.  I'd like to get the new plugin that Lonnie created for the 
firewall tested a bit too.

Regarding the label and upgrading, you can upgrade by manually mounting 
the runnix partition (mount -t vfat /dev/hdx1 /oldroot/cdrom).  The 0.5 
images were never officially released (only made as betas).  I would be 
surprised if there were more than a few people who ever used 0.5.

Darrick

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel&#174; Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________
Astlinux-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/astlinux-users

Donations to support AstLinux are graciously accepted via PayPal to 
[email protected].

Reply via email to