Darrick,
I didn't meant to get you all stirred up. I meant no harm.
and I did not ignored the request I posted my issue on the dev list. all I
was pointing out that the list seems quiet compare to here.
Lonnie told me to check something? to check what and when?
I did not get any emails telling me to check anything regarding the issue I
posted in the devel list.
With all you respect please check the facts before you go out and burn on
your users.
Thank You,
Fernando Fuentes
DIGITALVOIPNET.COM
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 1:40 PM, Darrick Hartman
<[email protected]>wrote:
> Fernando,
>
> This is not an issue where you're going to get an answer in 5 minutes. We
> are all here on a volunteer basis. You're going to have to do some digging
> on your own to fix this if you are using a platform other than what the
> developers are using.
>
> Additionally, we asked nicely that you use the -devel mailing list because
> this issues is a development issue, not an issue that affects anything that
> people subscribed to the -users mailing like likely care about. Ignoring
> that request does nothing to help get your question answered. If we had a
> quick answer, you would have gotten it when someone read the message.
> Lonnie responded to your question and had asked you to check something.
> You did not bother to answer that or do any digging on your own.
>
> Supporting the build environment on Debian/Ubuntu and Redhat/Centos covers
> over 90% of the users. If you choose to try to make this work on something
> else, you're going to be pretty much on your own. It _should_ work, but
> you're going to have to consult Google for more help. The general build
> system is based on a recent copy of buildroot.
>
> If you have the space on your system, I would suggest setting up a virtual
> machine with either CentOS6 or Debian6 as the operating system. I'd take
> that a step farther and use a 32bit version of the OS. That will allow you
> to use whatever you want as your main OS and keep the development
> environment isolated in it's own virtual machine.
>
> Regards,
>
> Darrick
>
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* Fernando F. [[email protected]]
> *Sent:* Thursday, December 08, 2011 1:20 PM
> *To:* AstLinux Users Mailing List
> *Subject:* Re: [Astlinux-users] one question
>
> Lonnie,
>
> The devel list seems way to quiet...
> I have been stuck with an error that I posted on the devel list...
>
> Thank You,
>
> Fernando Fuentes
> DIGITALVOIPNET.COM
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 9:01 AM, Lonnie Abelbeck <[email protected]
> > wrote:
>
>> Yes, AstLinux 1.0 (to be released soon) is built using crosstool-ng using
>> eglibc.
>>
>> If you want to try the new build system, we have documented the new
>> process:
>>
>> http://doc.astlinux.org/devdoc:documentation
>>
>> Lonnie
>>
>>
>>
>> On Dec 8, 2011, at 8:52 AM, Chris Abnett wrote:
>>
>> > I have been out of the loop for awhile..(almost 18 months since I did my
>> > last build) But looking to jump back in.. Does astlinux build under
>> > crosstool-ng now? I have been wanting to build against glibc for quite
>> > some time... Last I had heard it seemed no one was wanting to jettison
>> > uclibc at that time a couple years ago..
>> > -Chris
>> >
>> > On 12/8/11 9:26 AM, "Lonnie Abelbeck" <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Hi Fernando,
>> >>
>> >> It appears the developers here are using make-3.81, so the make-3.82
>> >> problem is new to us.
>> >>
>> >> $ make --version
>> >> GNU Make 3.81
>> >> ...
>> >>
>> >> Good to, know. Thanks.
>> >>
>> >> BTW: This kind of thread should be on the "Astlinux-devel" mailing
>> list.
>> >> Next time. :-)
>> >>
>> >> Lonnie
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Dec 8, 2011, at 7:56 AM, Fernando F. wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> Found my issue.
>> >>>
>> >>> --------------------------------
>> >>> Symptoms:
>> >>> glibc start files and headers fail with: [/usr/include/limits.h]
>> >>> Error 1
>> >>>
>> >>> Explanations:
>> >>> Old glibc (and eglibc) Makefiles break with make-3.82.
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Cloud Services Checklist: Pricing and Packaging Optimization
> This white paper is intended to serve as a reference, checklist and point
> of
> discussion for anyone considering optimizing the pricing and packaging
> model
> of a cloud services business. Read Now!
> http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51491232/
> _______________________________________________
> Astlinux-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/astlinux-users
>
> Donations to support AstLinux are graciously accepted via PayPal to
> [email protected].
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cloud Services Checklist: Pricing and Packaging Optimization
This white paper is intended to serve as a reference, checklist and point of
discussion for anyone considering optimizing the pricing and packaging model
of a cloud services business. Read Now!
http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51491232/
_______________________________________________
Astlinux-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/astlinux-users
Donations to support AstLinux are graciously accepted via PayPal to
[email protected].
