On 09/29/2014 03:53 AM, Kalle Valo wrote: >> Thanks. I think ath10k should do this instead of having CT-specific >> flush eventually. > > I agree. We should not be forking functionality unless absolutely > necessary.
Ok, this patch is easy to carry in my own tree. But, for things upstream firmware just cannot support, like tx-rate-status and rx-software-crypt, how do you want it flagged in the driver? Can I get the CT firmware flag in for that, or does it have to be some other way? If you just will not accept any such patch, let me know so I can quite bothering you about it. Thanks, Ben -- Ben Greear <[email protected]> Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com _______________________________________________ ath10k mailing list [email protected] http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k
