bruno randolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> On Monday 21 January 2008 15:44:46 Kalle Valo wrote:
>> > +  char buf[20];
>> > +
>> > +  if (copy_from_user(buf, userbuf, min_t(size_t, count, 20)))
>> > +          return -EFAULT;
>>
>> How about let the compiler count the size of buf? Like this:
>>
>> if (copy_from_user(buf, userbuf, min_t(size_t, count, sizeof(buf))))
>>
>> That way the size of buf is only in one place, and we might avoid a
>> bug whenever someone changes the size of buf.
>
> good idea. that way i can also get rid of min_t(size_t,...) and use min().

Even better.

>> > +static ssize_t read_file_debug(struct file *file, char __user *user_buf,
>> > +                             size_t count, loff_t *ppos)
>> > +{
>> > +  struct ath5k_softc *sc = file->private_data;
>> > +  char buf[1000];
>>
>> To my eyes allocating 1000 bytes from stack is too large.
>
> what about 700? ;) 
> the output currently is 626 byte.

Hehe :) I have no idea what's the preferred limit here, so I cannot
you give a definitive answer. But I would guess that 700 byte
allocation is still sensible with 4k stacks.

But this is for a debug interface so most likely this doesn't matter
that much.

-- 
Kalle Valo
_______________________________________________
ath5k-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ath5k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath5k-devel

Reply via email to