On Sun, 2010-03-14 at 08:15 +1300, Derek Smithies wrote: > Hi, > On Sat, 13 Mar 2010, Franczen Attila wrote: > > > 2010/3/11 Pavel Roskin <pro...@gnu.org> > > ath5k has some issues with calibration that MadWifi > > doesn't have, so MadWifi provides a better connection. > > > Are you saying that the throughput with ath5k will be less than what > madwifi can achieve? > > there were some recent patches from Bruno that were to do with calibration > - does Bruno's patches fix this difference?
I haven't tested that. However, I trust Bruno's tests, so we know that ath5k is not performing at its best right now. I cannot make any definite statements about MadWifi without testing. However, it's plausible that MadWifi might work better in the extremely bad conditions, e.g. when the antenna is disconnected. -- Regards, Pavel Roskin _______________________________________________ ath5k-devel mailing list ath5k-devel@lists.ath5k.org https://lists.ath5k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath5k-devel
