On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 09:14:04AM +0900, Bruno Randolf wrote: > On Thursday 22 April 2010 17:42:39 Joerg Pommnitz wrote: > > Bob, > > I just tested a recent wireless-testing snapshot. Unfortunately the problem > > still persists. > > Please consider the following patch for inclusion. For me it makes the > > difference between "freezes in minutes" and "works stable". I know it's at > > best a workaround and at worst a bad hack, but until the real cure has been > > found, this is what we should do, IMHO. > > sorry, i have to object! if this patch goes in, it will be less likely that > anyone cares enough to find a real solution, so this is not good.
I'm sympathetic to this viewpoint, but at least I don't have the bandwidth right now to track it down until my semester ends here in a few weeks. What do you propose Joerg do to further debug? What if as a compromise in the near term we do just the wakeup part (not all of reset) in a loop of length 2 with a FIXME? -- Bob Copeland %% www.bobcopeland.com _______________________________________________ ath5k-devel mailing list ath5k-devel@lists.ath5k.org https://lists.ath5k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath5k-devel
