Yeah, I'd dump them into the VO queue and set their retry counts much higher.
-a On 17 January 2014 22:57, Ben Greear <gree...@candelatech.com> wrote: > On 01/17/2014 10:22 PM, abhinav narain wrote: >> Hi Folks, >> I wanted to have some extra redundancy to be present in certain >> packets, like DNS frames so that I can increase the probability >> of it getting across. >> >> I was interested in knowing how can I achieve this in ath9k. >> Which functions should I look into ? >> Do I have to parse the frame in driver before transmitting to >> find out it is a DNS packet or is there something else that can >> be done cleverly ? >> >> PS: I understand that the sender and the receiver both have >> to be modified for such an aim. > > I'd first make sure they are sent on the VO (high priority) > queue. That could be done in the stack, or could be done in > the dns process for the station. For AP, it would probably have to > be done in the stack. > > Thanks, > Ben > >> >> Thanks, >> Abhinav >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> ath9k-devel mailing list >> ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org >> https://lists.ath9k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath9k-devel >> > > > -- > Ben Greear <gree...@candelatech.com> > Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com > > _______________________________________________ > ath9k-devel mailing list > ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org > https://lists.ath9k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath9k-devel _______________________________________________ ath9k-devel mailing list ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org https://lists.ath9k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath9k-devel
