On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 3:03 PM, Oleksij Rempel <li...@rempel-privat.de> wrote:
>
> Am 28.04.2014 22:43, schrieb Aaron Hamilton:
> > Has anyone had success running an ath9k_htc module in AP mode for any 
> > length of time? If so, what versions of OS/hostapd/ath are you using?  
> > Would you mind sharing your magic config files for your kernel, backports, 
> > hostapd, etc?
>
> Usually i do benchmark tests and some hours of load tests. Some devices
> fail on high load. Yesterday i was able to narrow down one of firmware
> crashes, but with current fw and kernel, it will recover connection in
> some seconds. So this problem is not nice, but not critical.
>
> If you are able to grub firmware log from uart port on the chip, or get
> panic report from kernel, if you have patched kernel, then it will be
> good start.

Unfortunately our modules don't have a UART port accessible. When
clients are no longer able to connect, I can't seem to find anything
unusual in dmesg. The only thing of interest are log entries for "IEEE
802.11: deauthenticated due to local deauth request". Although
sometimes there's no indicating or activity at all.

I'm deploying several units with debugfs enabled (wasn't there
previously). Is there anything I should be looking for there?

>
> In any case most interesting changes are from this year, so don't use
> old backports.
>
> If you have firmware crashes, i would suggest you todays FW source:
> https://github.com/olerem/open-ath9k-htc-firmware/commits/io_clean
>
> the difference to other branches is that panic report should show
> address of function which made ioread/write request
>
> > I'm desperate for stability as this problem has been ongoing for quite some 
> > time. We are using ar9710 chips in vehicle hotspots and the best we've been 
> > able to achieve is a few days of connectivity. Usually within hours all 
> > wifi clients loose their connection which can only be corrected with a 
> > hostapd restart (or power cycle).
>
> Are you sure you are using ar9710 with ath9k-htc?
>

Sorry, that's a typo. We're using AR9271 Rev 1 chipsets. Here's an
image: http://www.zcom.com.tw/program1/big_pic/ZCN-722M.jpg

I also neglected to mention that I've compiled the kernel without QoS
support as that seems to make the problem worse.

> > Here's our setup:
> > - host: at91 ARM processor on 2.6.39.4 kernel
> > - runtime power management and LED support removed from kernel (otherwise 
> > entire device reboots when load is put on wifi interface)
> > - hostapd-2.0
> > - latest ath9k_htc firmware compiled from source (indicates v1.4 on boot)
> >
> > At this point I'm willing to try just about anything to get at least a week 
> > or more of ongoing stability.
> >
> > Thanks in advance!
> > _______________________________________________
> > ath9k-devel mailing list
> > ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org
> > https://lists.ath9k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath9k-devel
> >
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Oleksij
>
_______________________________________________
ath9k-devel mailing list
ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org
https://lists.ath9k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath9k-devel

Reply via email to