On Thu, 2015-11-26 at 22:10 +0100, Michal Sojka wrote: > > Because in [1] Jouni said that > > "kernel config option + custom regdb would certainly be much > closer to what I'd like to see from the regulatory enforcement view > point" > > I also like the fact that the help text mentions the relevant > regulatory documents. I guess the users would appreciate that. >
Fair enough, but I'm not really convinced that the Kconfig option is needed for what Jouni really required. In any case, I spoke with him yesterday and we don't think that your patches are going to work as is - we'll need to change the regulatory flags it seems. I'll comment more specifically on the patches. johannes _______________________________________________ ath9k-devel mailing list ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org https://lists.ath9k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath9k-devel
